Which is better Battlefield 1 or Battlefield 4?

Battlefield Showdown: Battlefield 1 vs Battlefield 4

When it comes to first-person shooter (FPS) games, few franchises can boast the same level of acclaim as EA DICE’s Battlefield series. The franchise has spawned numerous successful titles, including Battlefield 4 (BF4) and Battlefield 1 (BF1). In this article, we’ll compare the two games head-to-head, focusing on key differences, improvements, and innovations that set each apart. Let’s start by tackling the most obvious question:

Which is Better, Battlefield 1 or Battlefield 4?

Before diving into the finer points, let’s state the obvious: Battlefield 1 is generally considered to be a significant improvement over its predecessor. This assessment isn’t simply due to personal opinions; various reviewers, both professional and amateur, have universally praised BF1’s new mechanics, maps, and visuals.

Why BF1 Excels

Several factors contribute to BF1’s superior status. For starters:

• Wartime realism: Battlefield 1 takes inspiration from the devastating First World War, whereas BF4 explores modern combat in a generic (and overdone) science fiction setting.
• Enhanced multiplayer experience: BF1 incorporates massive, beautifully realized maps (the likes of Verdun Heights, Hamada, and Aachen Streets), while BF4’s multiplayer map design received criticism for being uninspired and bland.
• Competent single-player campaign: Battlefield 1’s solid 18-hour campaign introduces you to various roles (Medics, Scout, Engineer) and narrative devices, which effectively balance combat with character development.

In contrast:

What Lacked in BF4

Here’s where Battlefield 4 fell short:

• Weaker narrative and characters: The abandoned story focuses primarily on General Ye Xi-Nora who struggles with identity crisis amid a lackluster storylines.
• Multiplayer bugs: Unsurprisingly, **multiple DLC packs released subsequent to release date fixed lingering bugs, resulting in smoother play experiences.
• Outdated visual capabilities: Initially, Battlefield 4 received widespread criticism for below-par graphical quality in comparison to Call of Duty: Ghosts (a key competitor during that period).

For those wondering whether it’s "too late" to hop onto BF1:

• Improved PC version: Following post-release patches and dedicated efforts by developers, BF1 has undergone various visual upgrades to catch up (or even surpass) contemporary counterparts.

Let’s consider key mechanics, highlighting each game’s most significant contributions and challenges.

Main Features

Vehicle Customization (BF4): Building on its reputation for excellent vehicles, Battlefield 4 excels at tailoring armored beasts, ground-pounding contraptions, and wings-in flight vehicles, as desired.
Tanks! However, tanks lack distinct attributes and upgrades (no specific tracks, cannons, etc.)

Infantry Fights and Battlefields (BF1)**: BF1 amplifies immersive experiences, ensuring your survival involves coordination and cover seeking across varied maps.

Now that the core comparison has taken shape, the next few questions likely stem from player-specific needs (new comers and long-timers):

Battlefield for All?

Before joining either fandom, you’re curious whether certain aspects (casual-playability or accessibility for beginners):

Yes or No: Most importantly:

• In Battlefield 4: Some community engagement might overwhelm novices initially.
• In Battlefield 1: Learning a basic **loadout system**, communicating with squad mates and employing diverse classes are excellent first-timers to practice (starters or ‘ new-pick-’ems’.**)
• If an ideal match or objective plays best in, look up playlists!
• If experiencing technical problems during multi/ co-op experience? Tinker or upgrade with game’s available software to adjust for personal systems requirements;

And before deciding to move:

If I Liked (Prior Game/ Genere/Pick/ Favorite?) i’ll surely also like BF(X)!***