Why does Fallout new vegas look so bad?

Why Does Fallout: New Vegas Look So Bad?

Fallout: New Vegas, released in 2010, was a highly anticipated game in the Fallout series, but it received criticism for its graphics and visuals. Many players and critics felt that the game looked subpar compared to other modern games at the time. So, what caused the game to look so bad?

Direct Answer:

The main reason why Fallout: New Vegas looks bad is due to the development cycle and resources allocated to the game. Bethesda Softworks, the publisher of the game, was facing financial difficulties and had to cut costs. The game’s development was outsourced to Obsidian Entertainment, a company known for its work on Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II and Neverwinter Nights 2. Obsidian was understaffed and underbudgeted compared to other game developers, which led to a rushed development process and subpar graphics.

Graphics Technology:

Fallout: New Vegas was developed using the Gamebryo engine, which was five years old at the time. The engine was initially designed for Morrowind and was updated for Oblivion, but it was not designed to handle the complexity of New Vegas’ game world. The engine’s limitations led to bad texture quality, poor lighting, and mediocre character models.

Other Technical Issues:

  • Crashing and Bugs: The game was plagued by crashes and bugs, which led to frustration for players.
  • Limited Animation: The game’s animations were limited, making the game feel stiff and unresponsive.
  • Poor Sound Design: The sound design was criticized for being too loud and overwhelming, making it difficult to focus on the game.

Comparison to Other Games:

To put things into perspective, Fallout 3, released two years prior to New Vegas, looked and played much better. The game had better graphics, sound design, and overall polish. New Vegas’ visuals and performance were not on the same level.

Table: Graphics Comparison between Fallout 3 and New Vegas

Fallout 3 Fallout: New Vegas
Graphics Quality Better texture quality Poor texture quality
Lighting More realistic lighting Limited lighting options
Character Models More detailed character models Simple character models
Animation Better animations Limited animations

What Could Have Been Done:

In hindsight, Bethesda and Obsidian could have delayed the game’s release to ensure a higher level of quality. They could have also invested more time and resources into the game’s development to address the technical issues.

FAQs and Answers:

Q: Why was the game’s development outsourced to Obsidian Entertainment?
A: Bethesda Softworks was facing financial difficulties and needed to cut costs. Outsourcing the development to Obsidian was a cost-effective solution.

Q: What were the main technical issues with the game?
A: The game suffered from bad texture quality, poor lighting, limited animation, and poor sound design.

Q: Why did the game’s development take so long?
A: The game’s development was delayed multiple times due to the complexity of the game world and the technical issues.

Q: Were there any plans to release the game on next-generation consoles?
A: No, the game was only released on Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and Microsoft Windows.

Q: How did the game’s reception affect the Fallout series?
A: The game’s mixed reception affected the series’ reputation, but Fallout 4 would go on to receive widespread critical acclaim and commercial success.

Q: Were there any post-launch patches or updates?
A: Yes, several patches and updates were released to address the game’s technical issues and bugs.

Q: Is the game still worth playing?
A: Yes, despite its technical issues, Fallout: New Vegas is still a great game with a rich storyline and engaging gameplay mechanics.

Q: Are there any mods available to improve the game’s graphics?
A: Yes, there are many mods available that can improve the game’s graphics and overall performance.

Conclusion:

Fallout: New Vegas was a game that showed promise but ultimately fell short due to technical issues and a rushed development process. Despite its flaws, the game has a dedicated fan base and is still worth playing today. However, it’s clear that Bethesda and Obsidian could have done more to ensure the game’s quality.

Leave a Comment