What mission is banned in Call of Duty?

The Most Infamous Exclusion: Unpacking the Banned “No Russian” Mission in Call of Duty

The “No Russian” mission from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is arguably the most controversial and frequently banned mission in the history of the Call of Duty franchise. Due to its graphic and disturbing content, which involves the player participating in a mass shooting of civilians at a Moscow airport, this mission has been censored or removed entirely from several international versions of the game. The mission’s primary purpose was to shock the player and establish the villain’s ruthlessness, but its explicit violence led to widespread debate and regulatory intervention.

A Deep Dive into the Controversy

The “No Russian” mission is the fourth mission in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, and it immediately sets a dark tone. Players take on the role of Joseph Allen, an undercover CIA operative embedded within a Russian terrorist group led by Vladimir Makarov. The mission unfolds as Allen and Makarov’s team enter Zakhaev International Airport and begin indiscriminately shooting unarmed civilians.

The player is given a choice: participate in the massacre or simply watch it unfold. Regardless of the player’s decision, the graphic scenes of violence are unavoidable. The sheer brutality and the targeting of innocent people sparked immense controversy even before the game’s official release.

Censorship and Removal

Many countries opted to censor or outright remove the “No Russian” mission from their versions of the game. For example:

  • Russia: The mission was completely removed from the Russian version of the game.
  • Japan and Germany: These countries offered heavily censored versions, omitting or altering the most graphic content.
  • Australia: Although the game was released with an MA15+ rating, the mission still generated substantial debate.

The controversy highlighted the delicate balance between artistic expression and the potential for desensitization to violence, especially in interactive media.

The Narrative Justification

The developers argued that the “No Russian” mission was essential to the game’s narrative. It served to:

  • Establish Makarov as a ruthless and unforgiving antagonist: The mission leaves no doubt about Makarov’s capacity for violence and his willingness to sacrifice innocent lives to achieve his goals.
  • Provide a motive for the game’s central conflict: The attack is designed to be a false flag operation, framing the United States and escalating tensions between Russia and the US, driving the game’s plot.
  • Create a memorable and impactful gaming experience: The mission is undeniably shocking and emotionally charged, leaving a lasting impression on players.

Despite these narrative justifications, the graphic nature of the content remained a major point of contention.

Legacy and Impact

The “No Russian” mission continues to be a subject of discussion in gaming circles. It raises fundamental questions about the role of violence in video games, the limits of artistic expression, and the responsibilities of game developers. The mission serves as a reminder of the power of interactive media to evoke strong emotional responses and to provoke meaningful conversations about complex social issues. The Games Learning Society and similar research organizations discuss the importance of games and learning. Check out the GamesLearningSociety.org website.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the “No Russian” Mission

Here are some frequently asked questions to provide additional valuable information:

1. Is the “No Russian” mission a real thing?

No, the “No Russian” mission is a fictional event depicted in the video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. While the scenario is not based on a specific real-world event, it draws inspiration from terrorist attacks and false flag operations.

2. Why is there a “No Russian” mission in Call of Duty?

The mission was included in the game to establish the villain’s ruthlessness, provide a motive for the game’s conflict, and create a memorable and impactful gaming experience. It was intended to shock the player and set the stage for the game’s narrative.

3. What does “No Russian” mean in Call of Duty?

“No Russian” is a phrase uttered by Vladimir Makarov to his team before they initiate the massacre at the airport. It serves as a reminder to not speak Russian during the attack, as the intention is to frame the United States for the event.

4. How many people died in the “No Russian” mission?

The in-game count indicates that 243 people are killed during the Zakhaev International Airport massacre. This includes civilians, airport security, and emergency responders.

5. What happens if you skip the “No Russian” mission?

The game allows players to skip the “No Russian” mission without any penalties. Skipping the mission does not affect achievements, completion awards, or the overall storyline. This option was provided to allow players to avoid the disturbing content if they chose to do so.

6. Is Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 inappropriate for children?

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is rated M for Mature by the ESRB, indicating that it is intended for audiences aged 17 and older. The game contains intense violence, blood, gore, profanity, and disturbing content that may not be suitable for children.

7. Who is the bad guy in Modern Warfare 2?

The primary antagonist in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is Lieutenant General Hershel von Shepherd III, also known as General Shepherd. He orchestrates events to manipulate the player and instigate conflict for his own gain. Vladimir Makarov is another key antagonist, responsible for the “No Russian” massacre and other acts of terrorism.

8. Why did Captain Price set off the nuke in the original Modern Warfare?

Captain Price launched the EMP device to disrupt Russian military technology and give American forces an advantage.

9. Is there anything inappropriate in Call of Duty games?

Call of Duty games often contain mature content, including graphic violence, blood, gore, profanity, and intense scenes. The level of inappropriateness varies from game to game, but the series is generally targeted toward mature audiences.

10. What was the worst Call of Duty campaign?

Opinions vary, but Call of Duty: Ghosts and Call of Duty: Vanguard are often cited as having the weakest campaigns in the franchise due to their unengaging storylines and less compelling characters.

11. Is Call of Duty OK for kids?

Due to its mature content, Call of Duty is generally not considered suitable for young children. While some settings can be adjusted to reduce the amount of violence and profanity, the core themes and gameplay are still intended for mature audiences.

12. Does Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 ban cheaters?

Yes, Activision actively bans cheaters from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 and Warzone. They employ various anti-cheat measures to maintain a fair and enjoyable gaming experience for all players.

13. How does the “No Russian” mission contribute to game-based learning?

While controversial, the “No Russian” mission can be analyzed from a game-based learning perspective to explore themes of morality, decision-making, and the consequences of violence. It can also prompt discussions about the ethical responsibilities of game developers and the impact of violent content on players. The Games Learning Society explores these connections.

14. What is the cultural impact of the “No Russian” mission?

The “No Russian” mission has had a significant cultural impact, sparking debates about censorship, violence in media, and the portrayal of sensitive issues in video games. It has become a symbol of the controversy surrounding mature video game content.

15. What were some of the main criticisms of the “No Russian” mission?

The main criticisms of the “No Russian” mission include:

  • Excessive graphic violence: The mission was criticized for its explicit portrayal of a mass shooting of civilians.
  • Potential for desensitization: Some critics argued that the mission could desensitize players to violence.
  • Lack of meaningful choice: Despite offering the option to avoid participating in the shooting, the mission still forced players to witness the violence.
  • Exploitation of real-world tragedies: Some argued that the mission exploited real-world tragedies for entertainment purposes.

In conclusion, the “No Russian” mission from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 remains a significant and controversial moment in gaming history. Its depiction of extreme violence sparked widespread debate and led to censorship and removal in various countries. The mission serves as a reminder of the complex ethical and social issues surrounding violent content in video games.

Leave a Comment