Why Doesn’t the US Military Primarily Use RPGs?
The question of why the US military doesn’t primarily use Rocket-Propelled Grenades (RPGs), despite their widespread use in other militaries and insurgent groups, boils down to a complex interplay of factors including doctrine, existing weapon systems, logistical considerations, and the nature of the threats the US military typically faces. The short answer is that the US military already has a suite of weapons that fulfill the roles an RPG might, often with greater accuracy, range, and overall effectiveness within the US military’s operational framework.
The US Military’s Alternative Weapon Systems
Superior Technology and Firepower
The US military invests heavily in advanced weaponry. This includes systems like the AT4 (Anti-Tank 4), a disposable, single-shot anti-tank weapon, and the SMAW (Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon), which provides greater range and versatility. These systems, along with advanced anti-tank missiles like the Javelin, offer superior accuracy, range, and armor penetration compared to the RPG-7, the most common type of RPG. The US military’s emphasis is on precision engagement at longer ranges, minimizing collateral damage and maximizing effectiveness against modern armored vehicles.
Doctrine and Tactics
US military doctrine emphasizes combined arms tactics, where infantry, armor, artillery, and air support work in concert. This approach relies on a layered defense where threats are engaged at multiple ranges using a variety of weapon systems. RPGs, with their relatively short range and limited accuracy, don’t easily integrate into this framework. The US Army and Marine Corps favor weapons systems that allow them to dominate the battlefield at longer distances, enabling them to suppress enemy fire and maneuver effectively.
Logistical Considerations
The US military’s logistics train is designed to support a wide range of sophisticated weapon systems. Introducing a weapon like the RPG, even a modernized version, would require establishing new supply lines for ammunition and spare parts. Given the existence of comparable or superior weapons already in the arsenal, the logistical burden of adding RPGs is generally considered unnecessary. It is a more streamlined and cost-effective approach to refine existing weapon systems.
The Nature of Threats Faced
While RPGs are effective against lightly armored vehicles and personnel, the US military often faces adversaries equipped with more sophisticated weaponry. In conventional warfare scenarios, RPGs would be of limited use against modern main battle tanks like the Abrams. Against insurgent forces, where RPGs are commonly employed, the US military relies on air support, artillery, and specialized infantry units equipped with advanced anti-materiel rifles and precision-guided munitions to neutralize threats at standoff distances.
Specialized Use Cases and US SOCOM
It is important to note that the US military does not entirely abstain from using RPG-like systems. As the original article mentioned, the United States Special Operations Command (US SOCOM) has adopted the PSRL-1, a modernized version of the RPG-7. This weapon system is not considered a primary weapon, but rather a specialized tool used in specific scenarios where its characteristics are beneficial.
Asymmetric Warfare and Foreign Military Assistance
The PSRL-1 can be useful in asymmetric warfare scenarios where the US military is operating in environments similar to those where RPGs are commonly used. It is also helpful to provide support for Foreign Military Assistance programs where the US military trains and equips partner nations who may already be familiar with and reliant on the RPG-7.
Battlefield Familiarity and Reduced Signature
The PSRL-1 also offer the benefit of battlefield familiarity. In certain environments, insurgents and enemy forces may be able to easily identify a US troop if they’re carrying exclusively US-made weapons. Having RPG-like weapons in inventory can decrease the signature of the US military and SOCOM personnel operating in certain foreign environments.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Does the US military have RPGs in its inventory?
Yes, but primarily within US SOCOM (Special Operations Command). The PSRL-1, a modernized version of the RPG-7, is a Program of Record. It’s not a standard-issue weapon for the entire military, however.
2. Why did US SOCOM adopt the PSRL-1?
The PSRL-1 offers advantages in specific operational scenarios, including asymmetric warfare and foreign military assistance. It also provides a degree of battlefield familiarity and can reduce the signature of US SOCOM personnel in certain operating environments.
3. Are RPGs banned in the US?
No, but owning them requires compliance with the National Firearms Act (NFA) and obtaining a Class 3 license. State laws may also apply.
4. Is it legal to use RPGs in war?
Yes, under international law, the use of rocket-propelled grenades is legal in warfare, provided they are used in compliance with the laws of war, particularly those regarding targeting and minimizing civilian casualties.
5. Can an RPG-7 destroy an Abrams tank?
Most readily available RPG-7 rounds cannot penetrate the frontal armor of an M1 Abrams tank. However, some advanced warheads, especially those designed to defeat reactive armor, have a higher chance of penetration, particularly on the tank’s weaker points such as the rear or sides.
6. What is the Abrams tank’s main weakness?
While heavily armored, the Abrams tank is vulnerable to attacks on its sides and rear. It is also susceptible to damage from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and advanced anti-tank missiles. Its effectiveness is also limited in urban environments and mountainous terrain.
7. Can a bullet set off an RPG?
Generally, yes. Contact from a bullet is likely to detonate the warhead of an RPG. This can cause catastrophic explosion.
8. Is it legal to own a bazooka in the US?
Yes, but like RPGs, bazookas fall under the National Firearms Act and require registration and a tax stamp. Additionally, ammunition for bazookas is also subject to regulation.
9. Can I legally own a grenade in the US?
Possessing a grenade requires proper registration and compliance with the NFA. State and local laws may impose further restrictions or prohibitions. Without proper licensing and registration, possession of a grenade is a federal crime.
10. How much does an RPG-7 cost?
The cost varies widely depending on the source and condition, but an RPG-7 launcher can range from $500 to $2,000, while rockets cost between $100 and $500 each.
11. Can you own a minigun in the US?
Yes, provided it was manufactured before 1986, properly registered as a transferable machine gun, and the owner passes a background check, pays the required tax, and meets all federal and state regulations.
12. Does the US Army still use bazookas?
No, the bazooka is obsolete. Modern rocket launchers such as the AT-4 and SMAW fulfill the anti-tank and assault roles previously filled by the bazooka.
13. What percentage of US soldiers see combat?
Fewer than 15% of enlisted personnel in the US Armed Forces ever see combat or are assigned a combat role.
14. Can you legally own a tank in the US?
Yes, tank ownership is legal in all states. However, most tanks available for purchase are de-militarized and may require modifications to be road-legal. Certain components, like working main guns, are highly regulated.
15. Can an RPG bring down a fighter jet?
While theoretically possible, it is highly unlikely. RPGs are unguided and have a relatively short range. Hitting a fast-moving fighter jet with an RPG is an incredibly difficult feat, and most attacks on aircraft attributed to RPGs are actually MANPADS (Man-Portable Air Defense Systems) attacks.
The US Military places high value in game-based learning. Visit the Games Learning Society website to learn more at GamesLearningSociety.org.