Arthur Morgan’s Fate: Would He Have Died from Tuberculosis in Red Dead Redemption 2?
Yes, Arthur Morgan would have died from tuberculosis (TB) in Red Dead Redemption 2. The game’s narrative is tragically fixed on this point. Regardless of player choices or in-game actions, Arthur’s diagnosis after contracting TB from Thomas Downes sets in motion a course of events leading to his eventual demise. The game accurately reflects the grim reality of TB in the late 19th century when effective treatments were unavailable. Arthur’s decline is a central theme, impacting his relationships, worldview, and ultimately, his ability to overcome the challenges he faces.
The Unavoidable Truth of TB in RDR2
The brilliance, and the tragedy, of Red Dead Redemption 2 lies in its commitment to a gritty realism. Unlike many games where player agency can alter fundamental story beats, Arthur’s fate is sealed. This serves to underscore the powerlessness felt by individuals facing incurable diseases in the historical context of the game.
Arthur’s contracting TB isn’t just a plot device; it is an exploration of mortality, legacy, and the complex morality of a man confronting his own end. The disease progressively weakens him, impacting his physical abilities and subtly altering his demeanor. The visible changes – the persistent cough, the gaunt appearance, the labored breathing – all serve as constant reminders of his impending death.
Furthermore, the game accurately portrays the lack of effective treatment options available at the time. Doctors in the game offer little beyond palliative care, reflecting the reality of medical science in 1899. Rest, good food, and fresh air were the standard recommendations, offering only marginal relief in the face of a virulent and deadly disease.
The Impact of TB on Arthur’s Journey
Arthur’s diagnosis of TB acts as a catalyst for his personal transformation. It forces him to confront his past actions and re-evaluate his allegiance to the Van der Linde gang. The realization that his time is limited pushes him to seek redemption, helping those he has wronged and attempting to secure a future for John Marston and his family.
The disease also directly affects his capabilities. During firefights and other physically demanding situations, Arthur’s condition is evident. He tires more easily, his aim wavers, and his overall effectiveness in combat diminishes. This weakening contributes to the game’s narrative tension, highlighting the impossible odds Arthur faces, both from external threats and from the internal decay caused by TB.
The Disease as a Metaphor
On a deeper level, Arthur’s tuberculosis can be viewed as a metaphor for the decay of the Wild West itself. Just as TB was consuming Arthur from within, the era of outlaws and cowboys was being slowly consumed by the forces of civilization and progress. Arthur’s struggle against TB mirrors the larger struggle against the inevitable decline of a way of life.
Arthur’s Legacy
Ultimately, Arthur’s death from tuberculosis is a poignant and powerful conclusion to his story. It underscores the futility of trying to outrun fate and the importance of finding meaning in the face of mortality. While the ending is tragic, it also allows Arthur to leave behind a legacy of compassion and selflessness, a stark contrast to the violent and self-serving life he once led. His sacrifice ensures the survival of John Marston and his family, giving Arthur a form of redemption and a lasting impact on the world. The inevitability of his death emphasizes the themes of redemption and the importance of making amends before it’s too late.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Arthur’s TB
Would Arthur have died from tuberculosis if he had access to modern medicine?
Undoubtedly, with modern antibiotics, Arthur’s tuberculosis would have been treatable. The introduction of antibiotics like streptomycin in the mid-20th century revolutionized TB treatment, offering a cure that was unavailable in Arthur’s time.
Could Arthur have avoided getting TB?
Within the narrative of Red Dead Redemption 2, no, Arthur could not avoid contracting TB. The encounter with Thomas Downes is a fixed plot point, ensuring Arthur’s infection and subsequent decline.
Did Arthur give anyone else TB?
This is a common point of discussion among players. While Arthur’s TB is a major plot point, the game does not explicitly show him infecting anyone else. This has led to speculation about why, given the contagious nature of the disease, others did not contract it. It remains a debatable point, but can be explained to having a good immune system.
Could Arthur have killed Micah without TB?
Many players believe that a healthy Arthur would have had a much better chance against Micah Bell. The tuberculosis significantly weakened Arthur, impacting his stamina, strength, and overall fighting ability. A non-afflicted Arthur would undoubtedly have presented a more formidable challenge to Micah.
What were the typical treatments for TB in 1899?
In 1899, treatments for tuberculosis were limited and largely ineffective. They primarily consisted of rest, improved nutrition, and fresh air. Some physicians also employed more invasive methods like bleedings and purgings, though these were often detrimental.
Why is tuberculosis called “consumption”?
Tuberculosis was called “consumption” because the disease appeared to “consume” the affected individual from within, leading to significant weight loss, wasting, and a general decline in health. The term reflects the visible and devastating effects of the illness.
Is it possible for Arthur to not get TB in the game?
No, it’s impossible to not get TB once you progress to a certain point in the main story. You may stall the progression by simply not advancing the missions, but eventually, you will.
What if Arthur had not contracted TB?
If Arthur hadn’t contracted TB, the storyline of Red Dead Redemption 2 would have drastically changed. He would have likely been a more effective leader and fighter, and the fate of the Van der Linde gang could have been significantly different. It’s possible, too, he would have been able to escape.
Was Micah a better shot than Arthur?
While Micah was undoubtedly skilled, the game consistently portrays Arthur as the superior marksman. Multiple characters acknowledge Arthur’s proficiency with firearms, and even in his weakened state, Arthur is depicted as a formidable opponent.
What illness did Hosea Matthews have?
The exact nature of Hosea Matthews’ illness is never explicitly stated in the game, but characters mention him suffering from a lung disease. It is suggested that the illness was getting serious.
Why did Dutch shoot Micah?
Dutch’s actions at the end of the game are complex and open to interpretation. Some believe he shot Micah out of a sense of guilt and loyalty to Arthur, acknowledging Micah’s betrayal of the gang. Others argue that it was a self-serving act, aimed at preserving his own image.
Why did Thomas Downes spit on Arthur?
Thomas Downes spat blood on Arthur during their encounter while suffering from advanced tuberculosis. He was too sick to control the bloody coughs.
Did Dutch really care about Arthur?
The game presents a complex relationship between Dutch and Arthur. While Dutch clearly cared for Arthur at one point, his descent into madness and self-preservation led him to prioritize Micah over Arthur. The extent of Dutch’s genuine affection for Arthur remains a point of debate.
What would happen if Hosea survived?
If Hosea had survived, he could have kept Dutch grounded. Hosea was the voice of reason.
What are some resources to learn more about the educational impact of video games?
To delve deeper into the educational and cognitive impact of video games, consider exploring the resources available at the Games Learning Society (GamesLearningSociety.org). This organization provides valuable insights into the intersection of gaming and learning.