Can a player be a mount?

Can a player be a mount

Can a Player Be a Mount in D&D 5e? Exploring the Rules and Possibilities

Quick answer
This page answers Can a player be a mount? quickly.

Fast answer first. Then use the tabs or video for more detail.

  • Watch the video explanation below for a faster overview.
  • Game mechanics may change with updates or patches.
  • Use this block to get the short answer without scrolling the whole page.
  • Read the FAQ section if the article has one.
  • Use the table of contents to jump straight to the detailed section you need.
  • Watch the video first, then skim the article for specifics.

The short answer is: Yes, a player character can technically be a mount in D&D 5e, but with significant caveats and considerations. While not a conventional aspect of gameplay, the rules don’t explicitly forbid it, opening the door for creative and potentially hilarious scenarios. However, it’s crucial to understand the rules governing mounted combat, and to recognize that the final decision rests with the Dungeon Master (DM). Let’s delve deeper into the specifics and explore what makes this unconventional option possible, and what factors might influence its implementation at your table.

The Core Rules: Size and Willingness

The cornerstone of the mounted combat rules is that a mount must be both willing and at least one size category larger than the rider. This creates the first hurdle for a player character to act as a mount. A Medium character can only serve as a mount for a Small character. This means that most party compositions will not allow for this as the most common character sizes are medium and large.

Willingness is Key

The requirement of willingness is crucial. Unlike an animal mount that can be trained, a player character, possessing free will, must actively agree to serve as a mount. This opens up role-playing opportunities and emphasizes that mounting another player is a consensual act. A player cannot be forced to be a mount against their will.

Anatomy and Believability

The rules also stipulate that a mount must have an appropriate anatomy for riding. This allows the DM to determine if the creature’s form is suitable for bearing a rider. While generally aimed at fantastical creatures, this can also apply to player characters. For instance, a heavily armored character might be deemed too cumbersome or their armor too restrictive for comfortable riding, even if the size requirements are met. However, a character with a sturdy build and less restrictive gear might make a more believable mount, particularly for lighter, smaller characters.

The Independent Mount: How it Works

If a player character meets the necessary requirements to serve as a mount and is willing, they function as an independent mount. This means they act on their own initiative and take their own turns. Unlike a controlled mount, the rider doesn’t dictate their actions. This adds a layer of tactical complexity as the mount (a player character in this case) may not always act precisely how the rider expects. However, both the rider and mount can make use of their actions on their respective turns.

Challenges and Considerations

There are several challenges that players and DMs need to address when considering a player character as a mount.

Combat Limitations

While technically permissible, using another player as a mount can be far less optimal than using a trained animal. The “mount” cannot dash on the same turn that the rider mounts or dismounts, creating action economy hurdles. Moreover, the lack of standard mount-related abilities means the PC serving as a mount won’t have a “dash” or other common mount actions. As such, it is not recommended in tense combat situations.

The Immersion Factor

The concept of a player character serving as a mount can stretch the limits of immersion. Depending on your table’s style, a smaller character riding another character might feel silly or out-of-place. The DM must consider the overall tone of their game and whether this choice would enhance or detract from the experience. Additionally, one would have to consider the actual method for this interaction; a harness? The smaller character holding onto the larger one? If it will be a regular occurrence it will be important to establish the logistics for immersion’s sake.

Tactical Disadvantages

Player characters are generally designed for combat roles, not as mounts. Using them as mounts removes them from the normal flow of battle. The rider might be more mobile, but the mount is essentially taking a player out of action. This can create vulnerabilities and weaken the party’s overall combat effectiveness. Unless there is a specific reason or benefit that allows it, the practice will more than likely be a net negative for the party.

When it Might Work

Despite the challenges, there are specific scenarios where a player character acting as a mount could be beneficial:

  • Roleplaying Opportunities: The interaction can be a fun and engaging way to develop character relationships, especially if characters have a good reason for this unusual arrangement.
  • Temporary Mobility Solution: In a short-term situation, such as crossing a difficult terrain or evading a danger, a larger player might help a smaller character quickly move to a position of relative safety.
  • Lighthearted Campaigns: In a campaign with a lighter tone or a focus on humor, this unusual choice can lead to entertaining moments.
  • Unique tactical needs: When a player is in a dire situation and needs an unorthodox maneuver to gain advantage or safety, a player can decide to act as an independent mount. This may be less optimal than having a normal mount, but might allow them to live another turn.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Here are some frequently asked questions about the possibility of a player being a mount in D&D 5e:

  1. Can a Small player ride a Medium player? Yes, a Small player can ride a willing Medium player, provided the DM approves that the Medium player’s anatomy is suitable for riding.
  2. What size must a mount be? A mount must be at least one size category larger than the rider. For example, a Medium character would need a Large mount, and a Small character would need a Medium mount.
  3. Do the rules explicitly forbid a player from being a mount? No, the rules do not explicitly forbid it. The rules simply outline mount criteria that players can meet if they wish.
  4. What happens if a player acting as a mount is injured? The player acting as a mount is affected by any damage or conditions that befall them, just like a normal character.
  5. Can a player-mount be forced to act as a mount? No. The creature acting as a mount must be willing. A player cannot be forced to serve as a mount against their will.
  6. Can the rider control a player acting as a mount? No, player-mounts act independently on their own initiative. The rider cannot control their actions directly.
  7. Is it optimal to use a player as a mount in combat? Generally, no. It is typically a sub-optimal choice due to the tactical drawbacks and loss of a character’s normal actions.
  8. Does a player-mount need a saddle? Technically, no saddle is required for the base rules of mounting in general, unless the mount is aquatic or flying, but a DM might decide that a player should be using one based on how they wish to rule on the anatomy requirements.
  9. Can a player mount and dismount on the same turn? No, mounting or dismounting can only occur once per turn during a player’s move.
  10. Can a player-mount use abilities or spells while mounted? Yes, the player-mount can still use abilities and spells as normal on their turn.
  11. Can the rider still cast spells while mounted on a player? Yes, the rider can cast spells normally provided that the player-mount doesn’t move more than their normal movement speed before or after the casting.
  12. Can a Druid wild shaped character be a mount? Yes. A druid who meets the size criteria and is willing can act as a mount in their wild shape form.
  13. Can two players ride one player? The rules don’t specifically address multiple riders. However, in general two players are not able to ride on a mount that is not at least a huge creature. The DM can decide whether they allow this and if the ‘mount’ has the appropriate anatomy for multiple riders.
  14. What are the disadvantages of using a player as a mount? The main disadvantages are reduced party action economy, a potential break in immersion, and the lack of typical mount abilities such as “dash” that make animal companions so effective.
  15. When might it be a good idea to use a player as a mount? This may be a good idea when there are strong narrative reasons, a need for quick transport over short distances, or simply as a lighthearted moment in a casual game.

Final Thoughts

The use of a player character as a mount is a fringe interaction, and often not a practical combat option. However, it is not strictly forbidden by the rules, and can be a fun and creative way to engage with the game, provided it’s done with a sense of awareness of its drawbacks. Remember, the DM has the final say, and considering the potential for both amusing and chaotic outcomes, it’s important to align with the DM and your fellow players before trying this in your campaign.

Leave a Comment