Navigating the Murky Waters: What Makes War Illegal?
Fast answer first. Then use the tabs or video for more detail.
- Watch the video explanation below for a faster overview.
- Game mechanics may change with updates or patches.
- Use this block to get the short answer without scrolling the whole page.
- Read the FAQ section if the article has one.
- Use the table of contents to jump straight to the detailed section you need.
- Watch the video first, then skim the article for specifics.
At its core, war becomes illegal when it violates international laws and norms designed to minimize suffering and uphold fundamental human rights. These laws, primarily rooted in international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the laws of war, seek to regulate the conduct of armed conflict. Illegality arises from both how a war is fought (the methods and means of warfare) and why a war is initiated (the justification for resorting to armed force). A war can be deemed illegal if it is an act of aggression violating the UN Charter or involves the commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide. In short, illegality stems from breaches of the legal frameworks governing armed conflict, aiming to protect civilians, limit unnecessary violence, and maintain a semblance of order in the chaos of war.
The Foundations of War’s Legality: Jus Ad Bellum and Jus In Bello
International law distinguishes between two critical aspects of war’s legality: jus ad bellum (the right to war) and jus in bello (justice in war). Understanding both is crucial to comprehending the broader legal landscape.
Jus Ad Bellum: The Right to Go to War
Jus ad bellum outlines the conditions under which a state may legitimately resort to war or the use of armed force. The most significant source of jus ad bellum is the United Nations Charter, which generally prohibits the use of force against another state. However, there are two primary exceptions:
-
Self-Defense: Article 51 of the UN Charter recognizes the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations. This right is limited to responding to an actual attack and must be proportionate to the threat.
-
Authorization by the UN Security Council: The Security Council, under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, can authorize the use of force to maintain or restore international peace and security. This typically occurs when the Security Council determines that there is a threat to peace, a breach of the peace, or an act of aggression.
Any war initiated outside these parameters is generally considered an illegal war of aggression, a violation of international law, and potentially a crime against peace.
Jus In Bello: Justice in War
Jus in bello governs the way in which warfare is conducted, regardless of the legality of the initial decision to go to war. It seeks to minimize suffering and protect non-combatants. Key principles of jus in bello include:
-
Distinction: Parties to a conflict must distinguish between combatants and civilians, and between military objectives and civilian objects. Direct attacks on civilians or civilian objects are strictly prohibited.
-
Proportionality: Even attacks on legitimate military objectives are unlawful if the expected incidental civilian casualties are excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
-
Military Necessity: Actions must be necessary to achieve a legitimate military objective and cannot be disproportionate or violate other rules of international law.
-
Humanity: This principle prohibits the infliction of unnecessary suffering. It bans the use of weapons or tactics that cause superfluous injury or inhumane treatment.
Violations of jus in bello constitute war crimes, for which individuals can be held accountable under international criminal law.
Consequences of Illegal War
The consequences of engaging in an illegal war are far-reaching. They can include:
-
International Sanctions: The UN Security Council or individual states may impose economic, diplomatic, or military sanctions on the aggressor state.
-
International Criminal Prosecution: Individuals responsible for planning or executing illegal wars, or for committing war crimes, can be prosecuted before international tribunals like the International Criminal Court (ICC) or national courts exercising universal jurisdiction.
-
Reparations: The aggressor state may be required to pay reparations to the victim state for damages caused by the illegal war.
-
Loss of Legitimacy: Engaging in an illegal war can severely damage a state’s international reputation and erode its legitimacy in the global community.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Legality of War
1. What constitutes a war crime?
A war crime is a serious violation of international humanitarian law committed during an armed conflict. Examples include deliberately targeting civilians, torture, pillage, using prohibited weapons, and taking hostages.
2. Is it legal to have a war?
Technically, yes, under very specific circumstances. The UN Charter permits the use of force in self-defense or when authorized by the UN Security Council. However, any other use of force is generally considered illegal under international law.
3. How is it legal to go to war in the USA?
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war. While the President can order military action, a formal declaration of war or congressional authorization (like an Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF) is typically considered necessary for a legal war.
4. What makes a weapon a war crime?
A weapon or tactic becomes a war crime if it violates the principles of jus in bello. This includes weapons that cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering (like expanding bullets), weapons that are inherently indiscriminate (like some cluster munitions), and the use of chemical or biological weapons.
5. Is launching a nuke a war crime?
The legality of using nuclear weapons is highly debated. A number of possible uses could constitute a war crime, particularly if they violate the principles of distinction or proportionality, causing excessive civilian casualties. There is no specific treaty banning the use of nuclear weapons outright, but their use is constrained by the general principles of IHL.
6. What’s not allowed in war?
Numerous actions are prohibited in war, including targeting civilians, using poison or asphyxiating gases, deploying biological or chemical weapons, using expanding bullets, and attacking medical personnel or facilities. The Geneva Conventions and other treaties outline specific prohibitions.
7. Is it a crime to start a war?
Initiating a war of aggression, meaning a war that violates the UN Charter by not being in self-defense or authorized by the Security Council, is considered a crime against peace under international law.
8. Is it illegal to run away from war?
For a civilian population, it’s generally not illegal to flee an active war zone; however, military personnel who desert or are absent without leave (AWOL) face serious military charges, potentially including imprisonment or even the death penalty in some cases.
9. Who can declare a just war?
According to just war theory, a war must be declared by a legitimate authority, have a just cause (e.g., self-defense or protecting others from grave injustice), be waged with the right intention, and have a reasonable prospect of success, among other criteria.
10. Can you refuse to go to war in USA?
In the U.S., individuals can apply for conscientious objector (CO) status, which allows them to refuse military service based on deeply held moral or religious beliefs. However, these beliefs must be consistently held and not based solely on political or personal convenience.
11. What kind of warfare is illegal?
Illegal warfare includes methods that violate jus in bello, such as perfidy (e.g., feigning surrender to launch an attack), terrorizing the civilian population, using starvation as a weapon, and attacking non-military objectives.
12. What is the biggest war crime?
Genocide, the deliberate attempt to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, is widely considered one of the most severe crimes against humanity and a particularly egregious war crime.
13. Was Pearl Harbor a war crime?
The attack on Pearl Harbor is a complex issue. While Japan and the U.S. were not formally at war at the time, the attack without a prior declaration of war or ultimatum was viewed by some as a violation of international norms, though not necessarily a “war crime” in the modern sense.
14. What happens if a soldier kills a civilian?
If a soldier kills a civilian in violation of the laws of war, it can constitute a war crime or a violation of military law. The soldier may face court-martial, prosecution in national courts, or prosecution before an international tribunal, depending on the circumstances.
15. Is destroying a dam a war crime?
Attacks on dams are generally considered war crimes unless they are used for military purposes and their destruction offers a definite military advantage. This is because the potential for widespread civilian casualties from flooding is so high.
The Imperative of Learning and Education
Understanding the laws of war is crucial, not just for military personnel and policymakers, but for all citizens. Promoting awareness of these laws can help prevent war crimes, mitigate the suffering caused by armed conflict, and foster a more just and peaceful world. Organizations such as the Games Learning Society are dedicated to using innovative approaches to teach complex topics like international law. Check out GamesLearningSociety.org to learn more about their work.
In conclusion, while war remains a tragic reality, international law provides a framework for limiting its brutality and holding perpetrators accountable. Upholding these laws is essential for safeguarding humanity and striving for a future where conflict is resolved through peaceful means.