The Banishment of Golos: Why Was Golos, Tireless Pilgrim Banned in Commander?
Fast answer first. Then use the tabs or video for more detail.
- Watch the video explanation below for a faster overview.
- Game mechanics may change with updates or patches.
- Use this block to get the short answer without scrolling the whole page.
- Read the FAQ section if the article has one.
- Use the table of contents to jump straight to the detailed section you need.
- Watch the video first, then skim the article for specifics.
Golos, Tireless Pilgrim, once a ubiquitous sight in Commander games, was banned by the Commander Rules Committee due to his overwhelming power and the homogenization of deckbuilding he fostered. His ability to fetch any land upon entering the battlefield and then cast three spells for free each turn proved to be too efficient and difficult to interact with, overshadowing a wide variety of other strategies and centralizing the format around him. Essentially, he warped the metagame, reducing the diversity and creative deckbuilding that are hallmarks of the Commander format.
The Rise and Fall of a Tireless Pilgrim
Golos’s appeal was undeniable. A five-color commander offering immediate value in the form of a land search, followed by the potential for massive card advantage through his activated ability, made him incredibly attractive. Players could build “goodstuff” decks, cramming in their most powerful cards from any color, and rely on Golos to provide both mana fixing and a consistent stream of free spells.
This, however, became the problem. The Rules Committee observed that many players defaulted to Golos not because he synergized with a specific theme or strategy, but because he was simply the best generic option. He created a situation where other commanders, especially those requiring more focused deckbuilding or offering less immediate value, struggled to compete. The Commander Rules Committee aims to promote diversity, creativity, and fun above all else.
The core issue wasn’t just that Golos was powerful; it was that his power was too easily accessible and too universally applicable. Other powerful commanders often require specific support or strategies to shine. Golos, in contrast, slotted seamlessly into nearly any deck looking to maximize value and card advantage. This led to repetitive gameplay experiences and a decline in the format’s overall diversity.
The three free spells were simply too efficient for a commander that cost only seven mana, warping the metagame and forcing other decks to compete with the card’s immense value.
Understanding the Commander Rules Committee’s Philosophy
To fully grasp the Golos ban, it’s important to understand the Commander Rules Committee’s core principles. They prioritize:
- Social Gameplay: Commander is designed to be a casual, multiplayer format where players can interact and build shared experiences.
- Diversity: The format should support a wide range of strategies and playstyles.
- Creative Deckbuilding: Players should be encouraged to explore unique themes and build decks that reflect their personal preferences.
- Fun and Interaction: Games should be engaging and interactive, with opportunities for players to make meaningful choices.
Golos violated these principles by:
- Reducing Strategic Diversity: He encouraged “goodstuff” decks over more focused strategies.
- Limiting Creative Deckbuilding: Players felt pressured to include Golos to remain competitive.
- Homogenizing Gameplay: Games featuring Golos often played out similarly, with players relying on his activated ability to generate value.
The Ban as a Course Correction
The Golos ban was not a condemnation of powerful cards in general. It was a targeted intervention aimed at addressing a specific problem: the overcentralization of the format around a single, generically powerful commander. By removing Golos from the command zone, the Rules Committee hoped to:
- Encourage Players to Explore Other Commanders: Removing the “best generic option” opens up opportunities for other commanders to shine.
- Promote More Diverse Deckbuilding: Players are now incentivized to build decks around specific themes and strategies, rather than simply maximizing value.
- Restore Format Diversity: The ban should lead to a wider range of playable strategies and a more varied metagame.
The Rules Committee carefully considers the impact of each ban and unban, weighing the potential benefits against any potential drawbacks. In the case of Golos, they concluded that the benefits of removing him from the command zone outweighed the drawbacks, ultimately leading to a healthier and more diverse format.
Commander and the Games Learning Society
The strategic and social complexities of Magic: The Gathering, particularly in formats like Commander, offer rich opportunities for learning. Organizations like the Games Learning Society at https://www.gameslearningsociety.org/, recognize the educational value of games, exploring how they can foster critical thinking, problem-solving, and social skills. The ever-evolving banlist and format rules create an active learning environment.
Golos Ban FAQs
1. Was Golos banned in all formats?
No. Golos, Tireless Pilgrim is only banned in the Commander format. He remains legal in other formats where he was previously legal, such as Legacy and Vintage.
2. Why wasn’t Golos just restricted to the 99 in Commander?
The issue wasn’t simply Golos’s power, but his consistency. Having him in the command zone guaranteed access to his ability every game, making his powerful effect too reliable and difficult to play around.
3. What are some good alternatives to Golos as a five-color commander?
There are many five-color commanders! The First Sliver encourages a Sliver-based strategy, while Kenrith, the Returned King offers versatile activated abilities. Ramos, Dragon Engine rewards players for casting multicolored spells.
4. Is it still okay to play Golos in the 99 of a Commander deck?
Yes! Golos is still a perfectly legal card to include in the 99 cards of your Commander deck.
5. What is the Commander Rules Committee?
The Commander Rules Committee is an independent group that oversees the rules and banned list for the Commander format. They are not affiliated with Wizards of the Coast.
6. How often does the Commander Rules Committee update the banned list?
The Rules Committee typically makes updates to the banned list on a quarterly basis, although they can make changes more frequently if necessary.
7. What factors does the Rules Committee consider when deciding to ban or unban a card?
The Rules Committee considers a variety of factors, including the card’s power level, its impact on format diversity, and its potential to create unfun or oppressive gameplay experiences.
8. Is the Rules Committee always right?
The Rules Committee’s decisions are often debated and scrutinized by the Commander community. While they strive to make informed decisions, their choices are subjective and may not always be universally agreed upon.
9. Were other cards banned or unbanned at the same time as Golos?
Yes, in the same announcement, Worldfire was unbanned in Commander.
10. What other cards are banned in Commander?
Some notable banned cards include: Ancestral Recall, Balance, Bazaar of Baghdad, Channel, Library of Alexandria, Mox Emerald, Mox Jet, Mox Pearl, Mox Ruby, Mox Sapphire, Painter’s Servant, Time Vault, and Yawgmoth’s Will.
11. Are silver-bordered cards legal in Commander?
Generally, silver-bordered cards are not legal in Commander, unless specifically allowed by your playgroup. Certain Unfinity cards with a black border are legal.
12. How can I suggest a card for the Rules Committee to consider banning or unbanning?
The Rules Committee welcomes feedback from the Commander community. You can reach them through their website or social media channels.
13. Is Yuriko, the Tiger’s Shadow banned in Commander?
Yuriko, the Tiger’s Shadow is banned as a commander only. She is legal in the 99.
14. Is Emrakul, the Aeons Torn legal in Commander?
No, Emrakul, the Aeons Torn is banned in Commander.
15. Are all Unfinity cards legal in Commander?
No, only Unfinity cards with a black border and without an acorn symbol are legal in Commander.