Table of Contents

The Kong vs. Kong Kerfuffle: Why Universal Studios Sued Nintendo

Quick answer

This page answers Why was Nintendo sued by Universal? quickly.

Fast answer first. Then use the tabs or video for more detail.

Watch the video explanation below for a faster overview.
Game mechanics may change with updates or patches.
Use this block to get the short answer without scrolling the whole page.

Read the FAQ section if the article has one.
Use the table of contents to jump straight to the detailed section you need.
Watch the video first, then skim the article for specifics.

▶

Universal Studios sued Nintendo in 1982, claiming that the video game Donkey Kong infringed upon their copyright to the movie King Kong. Universal argued that the similarities in the character design, premise, and overall concept of a giant ape terrorizing a city constituted copyright infringement. They asserted ownership over the King Kong name, characters, and story, believing Nintendo’s use of a large ape character would confuse consumers and damage their brand. The case became a landmark legal battle in the early video game industry, setting a precedent for copyright law regarding video game characters and intellectual property.

The Ape Lawsuit: A Clash of Titans

The Roots of the Conflict

The seeds of the lawsuit were sown in the early 1980s when the arcade game market was booming. Nintendo, a relatively small Japanese company at the time, was looking for a hit to break into the North American market. Shigeru Miyamoto, a young and talented game designer, was tasked with creating a new arcade game after they failed to secure the rights to use the Popeye characters.

Inspired by various sources, including Beauty and the Beast and the film King Kong, Miyamoto conceived a game where a large ape throws barrels at a carpenter trying to rescue a damsel in distress. He named the ape Donkey Kong, intending the name to convey a “stubborn ape.”

However, Universal Studios, who claimed to possess exclusive rights to King Kong, saw things differently. Universal had licensed the King Kong name to Tiger Electronics for a handheld game that was significantly less successful than Nintendo’s arcade hit. Seeing the immense popularity of Donkey Kong, Universal decided to take legal action against Nintendo, hoping to capitalize on the game’s success.

Universal’s Claim: A Monkey Wrench in Nintendo’s Plans

Universal’s argument rested on the assertion that they owned exclusive rights to the King Kong character and story elements. They claimed that Donkey Kong was a blatant rip-off, designed to confuse consumers and capitalize on the established popularity of King Kong. They threatened legal action against Nintendo’s distributors and licensees, attempting to strong-arm them into halting the distribution of the game.

Nintendo Fights Back: A Legal David vs. Goliath

Nintendo, facing a potential financial disaster, refused to back down. They hired John Kirby, a skilled and resourceful lawyer, to defend their case. Nintendo’s defense strategy was two-pronged:

Challenging Universal’s Copyright Claim: Nintendo argued that Universal’s claim to exclusive rights over King Kong was weak. They presented evidence showing that King Kong was in the public domain, as the original copyright had expired and Universal’s claim was based on subsequent remakes and adaptations. Furthermore, they argued that the similarities between Donkey Kong and King Kong were superficial and did not constitute copyright infringement.
Exposing Universal’s Hypocrisy: Nintendo uncovered evidence that Universal had previously argued in court that King Kong was in the public domain to defend themselves against a lawsuit from RKO Pictures. This revelation severely undermined Universal’s credibility and painted them as hypocritical in their attempt to claim exclusive rights to the character.

The Courtroom Battle: A Turning Point for Nintendo

The case went to trial in 1982, and Judge Robert W. Sweet ruled decisively in favor of Nintendo in 1983. The judge found that Universal did not have a valid copyright claim over King Kong and that Donkey Kong was not an infringement. Moreover, the court discovered that Universal was aware of similarities between Tiger’s King Kong game and Donkey Kong but did not take action against Tiger. The court also highlighted Universal’s contradictory stance on the King Kong copyright.

This victory was a turning point for Nintendo, solidifying their position in the video game industry. The lawsuit also had significant implications for copyright law, clarifying the boundaries of intellectual property protection in the context of video games. This ruling is important in understanding how Games Learning Society members can use IP in education settings.

Universal’s Defeat and its Aftermath

Not only did Universal lose the case, but they were also ordered to pay Nintendo damages to cover their legal fees and lost profits. The lawsuit cost Universal millions of dollars and severely damaged their reputation.

Nintendo’s victory in the Donkey Kong case cemented their status as a major player in the video game industry. It demonstrated their willingness to fight for their intellectual property and established a precedent for future copyright disputes. John Kirby, the lawyer who successfully defended Nintendo, became a hero within the company, and the character Kirby was later named in his honor.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Here are 15 frequently asked questions about the Universal vs. Nintendo lawsuit:

Why did Universal Studios believe they had a case against Nintendo? Universal believed they owned exclusive rights to the King Kong character and story, and they felt Donkey Kong was a deliberate infringement designed to capitalize on the popularity of their brand.
What was Nintendo’s main defense strategy? Nintendo argued that Universal’s copyright claim was weak and that King Kong was in the public domain. They also exposed Universal’s hypocrisy in previously arguing the opposite in a different legal case.
Who was John Kirby, and what was his role in the lawsuit? John Kirby was the lawyer who successfully defended Nintendo against Universal. He played a crucial role in uncovering evidence and presenting a strong defense.
What was the significance of Universal’s previous lawsuit with RKO Pictures? It revealed Universal’s previous claim that King Kong was in the public domain, undermining their current argument against Nintendo.
Did Donkey Kong truly infringe on King Kong’s copyright? The court ruled that the similarities were superficial and did not constitute copyright infringement.
What was the outcome of the lawsuit? Nintendo won the lawsuit, and Universal was ordered to pay damages to Nintendo.
How did this lawsuit affect Nintendo’s position in the video game industry? It solidified Nintendo’s position as a major player and demonstrated their willingness to fight for their intellectual property.
Did the lawsuit set any precedents for copyright law? Yes, it clarified the boundaries of intellectual property protection in the context of video games.
What happened to John Kirby after the lawsuit? He became a hero within Nintendo, and the character Kirby was later named in his honor.
Was the case a significant financial loss for Universal Studios? Yes, the lawsuit cost Universal millions of dollars in legal fees and damages.
Did Universal sue anyone else over King Kong? Universal was very protective of the King Kong rights and engaged in other legal battles relating to it.
Is Donkey Kong related to King Kong in any way? Fictional characters-wise, they are not directly related. King Kong is viewed as a generic term for a menacing ape in Japanese culture.
Did Shigeru Miyamoto draw inspiration from King Kong when creating Donkey Kong? Yes, he has stated he drew inspiration from that source.
What was the King Kong game that Tiger Electronics made? It was a handheld game that was licensed by Universal. Nintendo was later able to show this to demonstrate Universal’s support of what it was claiming was copyright infringement in their case.
Where can I learn more about copyright law and video games? The GamesLearningSociety.org website is a great resource for information on the intersection of games and legal frameworks, including copyright.